I simply don't understand the logic of Mr. Paje. Based on law and existing jurisprudence, the issuance of the ECC is ministerial in nature by the authorising agency, the Mines and Geosciences Bureau of the DENR. An ECC is a right or privilege granted to a juridical entity to explore the natural resources of a given area. The requirement is simple---when an entity submits its Environmental Impact Study and the EIS is deemed substantial compliance already by the MGB, the issuance of an ECC is already given and is ministerial.
There is no provision in existing law that an ECC can be denied simply on the basis of a ban imposed by a local government unit nor is it based on the whims and caprices of a Cabinet secretary. The law is clear--to avoid an exercise of excess power and jurisdiction by a Cabinet member, the legislature made it substantially clear that the denial of an ECC can only be imposed if the applicant has violated existing laws or has not made any study to mitigate the impact of such an exploration. Simple. Clear.
Is there any other reason to deny the ECC of a compliant SMI?
Mr. Paje should be made aware that the Tampakan PROJECT is a government project. It is not a private initiative of SMI. SMI is not just working for itself---it is a contractor of government. As a contractor of government, it is entitled to the full support of government, whether Paje likes it or not. It is the government that asked SMI to assist it in minerals exploration of Tampakan and not the other way around. When SMI passed the regulatory conditions set forth by the government as a contractor and when SMI won the contract, it is already presumed that the government already reviewed the technical competence of SMI as a contractor.
Don't tell me that now, government is reversing itself by saying that the very contractor it chose to handle the project is incompetent or technically unfit to handle the project? Who actually made the decision to hire SMI, ISN'T THE GOVERNMENT ITSELF?
Mr Paje's decision lay bare a government trying to undermine itself. That is not what President Aquino III wants. When he made a statement yesterday, assuring the business community of an open and liberal economy, President Aquino was trying to communicate to the foreign and local investor community of government non-interference to the business community.
How, then, can President Aquino explain this?
Even Mr. Paje's logic is very unsound. He says in numerous interviews that SMI should go to the courts as a remedy.
The Tampakan Copper-Gold project is one of the most ambitious minerals project of the GOvernment of the Republic of the Philippines. The project is expected to generate close to 39.8 billion pesos in royalty payments alone to the indigenous communities there in Tampakan. That amount would substantially develop the area and erase the scourge of poverty in that part of Mindanao. Imagine how many jobs would be generated by that.
SMI has spent close to 135 million pesos already in development projects alone in Tampakan. SMI is also the top revenue payor in the country. Other benefits include:
The region would enjoy substantial benefits from the mine which include:
- An annual contribution of on average PhP134 billion to Philippine gross domestic product (GDP) each year over the construction and operation phases – equivalent to an additional annual increase of 1% to Philippine GDP
- Total government revenues (national and local) through a variety of taxes and charges of approximately PhP307 billion (nominal) over the life of the Project
- Royalty payments and direct contributions in excess of PhP39.8billion (nominal) to local communities and local indigenous groups over the Project’s life
- Opportunities for approximately 10,000 workers during the peak of the construction phase and direct employment opportunities for approximately 2,000 workers during the operations phase
- Engagement of local contractors and service providers, generating further substantial employment within the Philippines.
Quite often, President Aquino has been severely criticized for not taking care of the economy. He was previously even blamed for the lack luster performance of the economy.
Now, this humongous investment project lies before him and his cabinet. As a government project, SMI deserves the full support of the Aquino administration. This project, if operationalize, would be the fifth largest copper-gold mine in the world and the largest in the Philippines.
Why make it extremely hard for SMI as a government partner to secure all these clearances and permits? Is Paje waiting for something?
I am afraid that if this administration mismanages or mishandles this issue, this could explode right before the very faces of these Cabinet members.
sir, hindi po totoo that "There is no provision in existing law that an ECC can be denied simply on the basis of a ban imposed by a local government unit"in there is no provision iECC the local government.
ReplyDeleteBago po kayo mabigyan ng ECC, kailangan po ng endorsement ng barangays affected at ng municipal at provincial development council. Huwag naman po nyong iligaw ang mamamayan.Bago pokayo magsulat ng ganyan e ituro po ninyo o ilakip sa sulat nyo ang ganooong probisyon. yong mga benepisyo na sinasabi nyo ay sabihin po ninyo sa mga mamamayan na apektado at sila po ang maykapangyarihan na i endorso ang proyekto. yan po ang saklaw ng batas sa ECC. Masama man po ang loob nyo ay wala tayong magagawa dahil tayo po ay isang demokratikong bansa. Hindi po kasalanan ng Pangulo o ng gobyerno kung ayaw pumayag ang mga tao. Ngayon sa benepisyo na iminumungkahi nyo ay itapat nyo din ang dahilan kung bakit ayaw ng mga tao sa"open pit mining". Kung napakalaki ng kapakinabangan sa kasiraan ay natitiyak na makukumbinsi ang mga tao na hayaan ang pag mimina na ito. Sa karaniwang mamamayan, ang mahalaga sa kanila ay madadagdagan ba ang kita ng bawat pamilya, pag may kasiraan sa mga ilog, gubat o pamayanan nila may konkreto bang kapalit. yan po ang ilista nyo at kung sila ay pumayag makukuha po nyo ang suporta nila. pumunta po kayo, harapin sila at ipaliwanag o ibenta sa kanila ang proyekto. kung sila man ay mahirap at sasabihin ninyo na gaganda ang buhay nila at ayaw pa rin nila wala po kayong magagawa. ang tawag po dito ay "social marketing" dagdagan pa po ninyo ang sipag sa pagkumbinsi sa kanila at hwag po nating awayin si pang.aquino at g.paje dahil pag ipinilit
ang ginusto nyo o gumamit ng dahas, magagalit po ang mga tao sa kanila. konting tyaga pa po. maraming salamat
O Hungkag,
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry but it is YOU who are not informed about the ECC process. Under DENR MC 2007-08, no permits and/or clearances issued by the National Government Agencies and LGUs shall be required in the processing of ECC or CNC applications.
So, it does not follow that SMI needs a clearance from the LGU before DENR can issue an ECC.
Hence, it does not necessarily follow for Paje TO CONSIDER THE BAN since it is not required by law that an ordinance can actually stop the issuance of an ECC. SEE THIS LINK FOR THE PROCESS FLOW OF AN ECC:
http://r12.denr.gov.ph/attachments/Transparency%20Govenance/emb5/ECC%20for%20Envi%20Critical%20Project.pdf
This document proves that it is but ministerial on the part of the DENR to grant an ECC if the company applicant has adequately passed the EIS and the study has conformed with existing laws on the environment.