I don't really see the point being made by the National Historical Institute (NHI). As a historiographer myself, I think it is stupid for the NHI to monitor every single artist or citizen out there while they're singing the National anthem.
Instead of correcting the errors in history books and probably engaging people in more relevant pursuits, like reminding them of the important events in our history, people over there at NHI are acting like voice coaches or music teachers.
Why file a case against Arnel Pineda or Martin Nievera just because they sang the national anthem in a higher pitch or tune than the others. Are we really fooling ourselves?
Who, really knows how to sing Felipe's masterpiece? Who, except the composer and the lyricists who are both dead, know the exact tune or pitch or cadence of our national song.
One's love for the country is not to be measured by the pitch or the tune that one gives out whenever he sings the anthem. We live in a democracy and we can sing it in whatever manner we want for as long as we don't change the lyrics.
Net--its not the tune stupid. It's the lyrics that matter.
I will be the first one to militate against those who will change the lyrics of our national anthem. That is a totally different matter altogether.
The NHI is acting like Hitler's SS when, again, they want Pinoy international artist Arnel Pineda charged for singing the national anthem higher in pitch and tune than what the composer intended. Lest the NHI forget--we are in a democracy and something as trivial as a higher tune is excusable.
It would disparage the memory of our heroes and patriots if the NHI continues to behave like old hags with a stick in hand, ready to strike someone's butt for singing in tune, but in a higher pitch. This is not the way to educate the people about our heritage and history. Fact is--this is the most insolent and the most stupid way to illuminate us of the finer points of our history.
And Arnel Pineda should not apologize. Fact is, Pineda should even give the NHI a piece of his creative mind.
Showing posts with label national historical institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national historical institute. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
National Anthem, Martin and the Las Vegas 50
I'm an eighties guy and like the rest of our generation, we were serenaded by the lovely melodies of Martin Nievera and Gary Valenciano, not to mention danced in the streets whenever we hear of The Dawn, Cocojam, and other punk and New Wave tunes.
And when I heard of Martin singing the Philippine National anthem, I thought to myself--is this Martin's eighties version of this sacred and hallowed song? I mean, " Be My Lady" used to be a hit in my milieu and it came out fine. But this latest version of a song which prodded thousands of Katipuneros ala-80's to kill conos and Peninsulares, was it properly sung?
Some Congressmen and even Senators want Martin investigated and for what? For singing the National Anthem like Ricky Martin. Huh? Why?
Why spend taxpayers money probing on something which is actually an artistic rendition of a patriotic song? And whose to say that Martin did it improperly? Those who can't sing? Are those historians at the National Historical Institute really know how to sing the National anthem?
I think these legislators just want to divert the public clamor for the 50 or so government officials who went to Las Vegas to watch the Manny Pacquiao fight. They saw a diversionary issue. Instead of them, they want Martin hanged. For singing the National Anthem the way he thought best? Why question artistry? Why even probe on Martin?
Besides, make them sing the National Anthem. Surely, some, if not all, would definitely buckle and would probably miss a few lines. Or, maybe ALL OF THESE LEGISLATORS would not be able to sing the National anthem the way our predecessors want it sung.
And when I heard of Martin singing the Philippine National anthem, I thought to myself--is this Martin's eighties version of this sacred and hallowed song? I mean, " Be My Lady" used to be a hit in my milieu and it came out fine. But this latest version of a song which prodded thousands of Katipuneros ala-80's to kill conos and Peninsulares, was it properly sung?
Some Congressmen and even Senators want Martin investigated and for what? For singing the National Anthem like Ricky Martin. Huh? Why?
Why spend taxpayers money probing on something which is actually an artistic rendition of a patriotic song? And whose to say that Martin did it improperly? Those who can't sing? Are those historians at the National Historical Institute really know how to sing the National anthem?
I think these legislators just want to divert the public clamor for the 50 or so government officials who went to Las Vegas to watch the Manny Pacquiao fight. They saw a diversionary issue. Instead of them, they want Martin hanged. For singing the National Anthem the way he thought best? Why question artistry? Why even probe on Martin?
Besides, make them sing the National Anthem. Surely, some, if not all, would definitely buckle and would probably miss a few lines. Or, maybe ALL OF THESE LEGISLATORS would not be able to sing the National anthem the way our predecessors want it sung.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
