Chief Justice Renato Corona and his spokespersons should meet and listen to what each group is saying before the public. The reason why the Chief Justice's trust ratings is still very low is the fact that each group does not know what the other is doing, or telling the public. There is no unified statement, so to speak, and this hurts the already tattered image of Corona.
For one, Corona says that there is no property ascribed to him in the United States, and then says, after one day, that his daughter actually brought one--cheap. These kinds of statements offer nothing but contempt from a listening public, who already gave the CJ enough time to tell his position before the public. The very fact that MORE THAN HALF of the Filipino People are still not convinced of the culpability of Corona shows you how weak the prosecution case is and how believable the defense is before the bar of law and eventually, before the bar of public opinion.
The strong case presented by the defense on these properties negate the very proposition of the Prosecution that there was even an ounce of ill-gotten wealth stashed somewhere. The very fact that no such property or stash of money were discovered shows you how weak the preparation of the prosecution is. This fact is not being articulated properly before the media. Mere general statements are being heard from the side of Corona, hence, not enough for the public to form a sizeable positive opinion about him.
Corona needs all the media exposure available to him, not because he's fighting for his life before the impeachment court. He needs proper image restoration strategies so that he keeps his integrity intact in case he wins this impeachment. Unlike ERAP where the trial was cut short by extraneous events, in Corona's case, there is no such popular or highly public show of hate that's why he is now enjoying the time given to him to explain why he should not be impeached.
Corona does not need amateurish publicists handling his case. He needs expert advice and fast.
The possibility of his victory before the courts is there. The probability that this administration will stop harassing him shortly after May is also there (because after May, it's election time in the Philippines). All he needs to do is use this time given to him to push his case more strongly and more resolutely before the people. Otherwise, even if he wins this, he just might encounter another challenge which will eventually lead to his untimely resignation.
Showing posts with label update on the impeachment trial of chief justice corona. Show all posts
Showing posts with label update on the impeachment trial of chief justice corona. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Stronger Elite Dictatorship in the works?
Alan Paguia, former counsel of deposed president Joseph Estrada and Atty. Homobono Adaza have allied and filed a case appealing for a TRO against the impeachment trial. Both lawyers say, that impeachment trial is unconstitutional.
These two had brushes with the Supreme Court before, especially Paguia who once courted the Court's ire. Curiously, they are now the ones "defending" the Supreme Court. Trying to court favors with the Court? I doubt it. I know the calibre of these two colorful characters. Adaza is a good friend, and former counsel of the Young Officers' Union (YOU). He is an idealistic guy. Maybe he's doing it because he really wants changes in government.
S4S (Solidarity for Sovereignty) is a highly credible organisation of idealists. They really want changes. However, I don't know why they tried to ally themselves with this impeachment issue. It is very hard even tactically to defend someone whom the people perceive even now, as corrupt. If S4S thinks that this is an explosive issue that is sure to hit President Aquino directly, then, their reading is faulty, to say the least.
The issue is the creeping dictatorship of the elites, led by the Aquino faction. The issue is the attempts at using the very Constitution to institute an elite dictatorship. And the real issue is not Hacienda Luisita or any other cases where certain personalities close to the Chief Executive have interests on. No.
The issue is---the repeal of the Military pacts between the UNited States and the Philippines. The issue is the amendments to the VFA between these two countries which, certain quarters suspect, contain provisions that violate the 1987 Constitution. And since any constitutional amendments or revision are out of the available options, changes are to be coursed through the Supreme Court.
This early, we are feeling the effects of a strong elite-based dictatorship in the way this administration acts and feels about certain issues. ON Economic issues, for example, the prevailing policy is globalization and a free for all economy. This is to benefit Big BUsiness interests especially with those close to the President.
On the political side, strengthening of the main political aggrupation of close Aquino associates to further their hold on to power even after 2016.
Many people ask me--where will all these lead to?
If the impeachment trial goes by the distance, expect an acquittal. The acquittal will further damage the relationship between the executive and the judiciary because, as what I wrote several entries before, for as long as Corona stays as Chief Justice, decisions issued by the Supreme Court will be scrutinized and will be under a cloud of doubt.
If the impeachment trial is cut short--and many people expect this to happen--then it would lead to political chaos, which could be exploited by unfriendly forces.
These two had brushes with the Supreme Court before, especially Paguia who once courted the Court's ire. Curiously, they are now the ones "defending" the Supreme Court. Trying to court favors with the Court? I doubt it. I know the calibre of these two colorful characters. Adaza is a good friend, and former counsel of the Young Officers' Union (YOU). He is an idealistic guy. Maybe he's doing it because he really wants changes in government.
S4S (Solidarity for Sovereignty) is a highly credible organisation of idealists. They really want changes. However, I don't know why they tried to ally themselves with this impeachment issue. It is very hard even tactically to defend someone whom the people perceive even now, as corrupt. If S4S thinks that this is an explosive issue that is sure to hit President Aquino directly, then, their reading is faulty, to say the least.
The issue is the creeping dictatorship of the elites, led by the Aquino faction. The issue is the attempts at using the very Constitution to institute an elite dictatorship. And the real issue is not Hacienda Luisita or any other cases where certain personalities close to the Chief Executive have interests on. No.
The issue is---the repeal of the Military pacts between the UNited States and the Philippines. The issue is the amendments to the VFA between these two countries which, certain quarters suspect, contain provisions that violate the 1987 Constitution. And since any constitutional amendments or revision are out of the available options, changes are to be coursed through the Supreme Court.
This early, we are feeling the effects of a strong elite-based dictatorship in the way this administration acts and feels about certain issues. ON Economic issues, for example, the prevailing policy is globalization and a free for all economy. This is to benefit Big BUsiness interests especially with those close to the President.
On the political side, strengthening of the main political aggrupation of close Aquino associates to further their hold on to power even after 2016.
Many people ask me--where will all these lead to?
If the impeachment trial goes by the distance, expect an acquittal. The acquittal will further damage the relationship between the executive and the judiciary because, as what I wrote several entries before, for as long as Corona stays as Chief Justice, decisions issued by the Supreme Court will be scrutinized and will be under a cloud of doubt.
If the impeachment trial is cut short--and many people expect this to happen--then it would lead to political chaos, which could be exploited by unfriendly forces.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)