Showing posts with label martial law in maguindanao. Show all posts
Showing posts with label martial law in maguindanao. Show all posts

Friday, December 11, 2009

Martial law--a painless inocculation


September 21, 1972 was the day when Marcos declared our second Martial Law. Jose Laurel was the first one under threat of an invasion. Marcos' version was of a "smiling Martial Law". And he succeeded.

What is the meaning of a smiling Martial law? One former Marcos detainee, a friend of mine, described it as a "painless inocculation". While another one, this time, a colleague in the underground says, it is more of "circumcision, lots of blood, but with less pain". Wow.

While researching for materials about Martial law, I remembered Eman and his brother Pete Lacaba. Eman was a creative force in the anti-Marcos movement, a martyr-ed poet who expressed his generation's rage against Martial law. While Pete served as his generation's chronicler.

If we actually read and look back, martial rule was imposed by Marcos specifically to address a raging revolution against his illegal rule. Remember that street protests exploded when Marcos rigged the elections and tried to exhaust all legal means to extend his rule. What I observed between what Marcos did before and what Arroyo is now doing, at least Marcos had the gall to debate with those who oppose him. Marcos was at least brave enough to challenge those who oppose him to a debate. While you know how Mrs. Arroyo always try to avoid public scrutiny especially when she issues a debatable or controversial measure, like this creature called Proclamation 1959.

Let us look back in History and learn from it. This is the account of Pete Lacaba in the Philippine Free Press, dated February 7, 1970.

And the January 30 Insurrection, February 7, 1970


February 7, 1970



And the January 30 Insurrection

–Jose F. Lacaba


JANUARY 26 seemed explosive enough—but it was a whimper compared with the horrendous bang of January 30. The papers called January 26 a riot. January 30 was something else. “This is no longer a riot,? said a police officer. “This is an insurrection? And the President called it a revolt—“a revolt by local Maoist Communists?

January 26 was a Monday. On Tuesday the students met to plan a series of new rallies denouncing police brutality, and the President conferred with police officials. On Wednesday the President had a talk with some student leaders in Malacañang. On Thursday four groups of demonstrators, one of them led by U.P. President S. P. Lopez himself, staged simultaneous demonstrations at Malacañang, Congress, and Maharnilad. On Friday several other student groups held a sit-in outside the Malacañang gates—and just as their manifestation was about to end, all hell broke loose.

Tuesday, about 120 leaders, representing 36 schools and at least a dozen national youth organizations, gathered at the Far Eastern University. NUSP President Edgar Jopson, of the Ateneo, presided over the three-hour meeting, during which a resolution was passed demanding the resignation of certain officials of law enforcement agencies, and Friday was set as the starting date of the series of rallies. While the students were conferring at the FEU, the President was in a huddle with law enforcement officials in Malacañang. He told them to be “more tolerant to the future leaders of the country? and ordered them to drop the charges against the students arrested on January 26.

Wednesday, Mayor Villegas announced that the Manila police would stay away from future demonstrations to avoid trouble, but that they would stand by, “within beck and call of violence erupts? The NUSP and the National Students’ League rejected an invitation to meet with the President in Malacañang, saying they preferred to have the talks on Friday. Another group of student leaders went there anyway and heard the President say: “I personally do not want to have anything to do with the Constitutional Convention? The Senate and the House created a committee to investigate the “root causes of demonstrations in general? The Manila police filed complaints of alarm and scandal against 18 students caught in the battle of Burgos Drive. “The whole world is in ferment and youth is on the march? said Brigadier General Vicente Raval of the PC. “It is essential that, in our country, we take the greatest care in dealing with the problem? He proposed the immediate acquisition of “non-lethal equipment for the police and urged that they be re-trained in “the highly sensitive science of dealing with demonstrators?

Thursday, there were four groups of demonstrators. Students from the Philippine Normal College and members of the College Editors Guild of the Philippines held separate rallies. Students from the University of the East gathered first at Malacañang, then moved on to Maharnilad, where trouble was avoided when a policeman whose jeep was stoned simply drove away without a fight. When the UE students left Malacañang, the UP professors, led by S. P. Lopez, arrived and were angrily reprimanded by the President: “You yourselves are vague and confused about the issues you have raised against the government? The President challenged any Communist in the group to a debate, and when a student leader accused him of using the army and the Special Forces in the elections, he asked: “Are you a Liberal? Meanwhile, police reporters agreed to wear distinctive uniforms when covering demonstrations, to avoid being stoned by students and clobbered by cops.

And then it was Friday, January 30.

Again, there were simultaneous demonstrations. To Congress went members of the KM, the SDK, the MPKP, and other militant groups. The NUSP and the NSL marched on Malacañang.

At about three in the afternoon, Jopson, Portia Ilagan of the NSL, and other student leaders went into Malacañang for a meeting with the President.

Sometime past five, the rally at Congress came to an end, and the demonstrators marched on to Malacañang, arriving there at about six.

What specific event precipitated the battled that spread out to other parts of the city, and lasted till dawn the next day, may never be known. The students who came from Congress claim that, as they were approaching J. P. Laurel Street, they heard something that sounded like firecrackers going off. When they got to Malacañang, the crowd was getting to be unruly. It was growing dark, and the lamps on the Malacañang gates had not been turned on. There was a shout of “Sindihan ang ilaw! Sindihan ang ilaw! Malacañang obliged, the lights went on, and then crash! A rock blasted out one of the lamps. One by one, the lights were put out by stones or sticks.

A commotion was now going on at the Mendiola gate of the Palace. A firetruck inside the Palace grounds advanced and trained its hoses on the student rebels. The students retreated, and a brief period of lull followed. At about seven, a truck from the Manila Fire Department, responding to an alarm, came up from Sta. Mesa, its sirens dead, and slowed down in front of St. Jude Church. The firemen probably intended to blast away at the students, but water must really be scarce. Nothing but an ineffectual, sputtering spurt came out of their water cannon. The students charged, the truck backed off—but not fast enough. The firemen who were not quick to flee got beaten up.

The rebels now had a captured firetruck at their disposal. They drove it toward the Mendiola gate and used it as a battering ram of sorts until the locks gave away, the chains broke, and the gate clanked open. Into the breach surged the more daring demonstrators. They had apparently come prepared for the assault. They lobbed molotovs and pillboxes into the Palace grounds; the flames spread down the road when the molotovs crashed to the ground, the nails and broken pieces of glass scattered when the pillboxes exploded.

Once inside the gate, the rebels stoned the buildings and set fire to the truck and to a government car that happened to be parked nearby. Before they could wreak more havoc, however, the Presidential Guard Battalion came out in force. They fired into the air and, when the rebs held their ground, fired tear gas bombs at them. The rebs retreated; the few how were slow on their feet, or were blinded by the tear gas, got caught in the Palace grounds and were beaten up with rifle butts and billy clubs and good old-fashioned fists and feet.

About this time, reinforcements from the Constabulary arrived, later to be joined by the army, the navy, and the Metrocom. The pattern of the January 26 battle was repeated: the military would attack, the students would retreat; the students would counterattack, the military would draw back. At about nine, the soldiers had gained control of Mendiola and J. P. Laurel. The students were holding Tuberias, Legarda, and Claro M. Recto; some had retreated down Arlegui and into Quiapo, where looters took advantage of the situation in the Lacson Underpass, breaking display windows and grabbing jewelry and shoes.

On Tuberias, when I got there at about nine o’clock, the students were turning away all vehicles. The soldiers were at the corner of Tuberias and Mendiola, and steadily advancing. The students held their ground, hurling rocks, until they heard the sound of rifles being cocked. Then they scattered, some jumping over high walls into the yards of houses, others being voluntarily let in by apartment inhabitants. I fell in with a small group that took shelter at the mouth of a dark alley. A boy of about 12, in slippers, obviously a resident of the place, said there was a way out if we wanted to take a chance. He guided us down the long dark winding alley, down narrow catwalks, past walls smelling of urine, past accessorias with crumbling facades, until we came out, to our surprise, on Claro M. Recto.

At the end of Recto, where it hits Legarda, the students were massed, tense, turbulent, flinging rock and insults at the men in uniform—they looked like Constabulary troopers—guarding the bridge that leads to Mendiola. In the center of the cross formed by Recto, Mendiola, and Legarda was a burning jeep, its flames a bright yellow curtain separating the combatants. From the left side of Legarda came more shouts; there were other demonstrators there, and the troopers had to guard the bridge against two armies of students, one attacking from the front, the other attacking from the side.

It was at this point, with the students closing in from Recto and Legarda, that the troopers started firing—rat-tat-tat-tat-tat, the sound of a Thompson submachine gun—into the ground. Dust and tiny pebbles exploded from the cement and, where I stood, two rows behind the front lines, I felt a sudden sharp stinging pain in my chest. I’m hit, I thought, when I saw spots of blood on my shirt front; but since I didn’t fall, I gingerly unbuttoned my shirt. Imbedded right below my right nipple was an itty-bitty piece of cement. I carefully pulled it out and was examining it like a jeweler scrutinizing some precious gem from the moon when, before my eyes, there passed a student, supported by his comrades, one of his hands—the right, I think—now nothing more than a mess of blood and burning flesh, the fingers dangling like dead worms attached to his wrist only by a few threads of broken bones.

I was standing there in horror when another student, limping, fell into my arms. I recognized him to be one of the students who had come with us through the alley from Tuberias. He had one wound on his right leg, below the knee, and another on the outer ankle bone. A bystander watching from the sidewalk helped me carry him up Claro M. Recto, where we found a white car—a Taunus, I think—whose owner was good enough to take us to the UE Memorial Hospital. There they treated my very minor wound, but they could do nothing, they said, for the boy who had been shot in the leg. We then took a taxi—the owner of the car had gone back to the battle scene, looking for some fraternity brods—and brought our ward to the Orthopedic Hospital, where, at that very moment, as bad luck would have it, a small fire was raging on one of the upper floors. The fire did something to the X-rays, and the interns had to put the wounded boy’s leg in a cast, unable to check if a bullet was in his system.

The doctors at the Orthopedic Hospital agreed to let the wounded student stay for the night, until his friends or relatives could be contacted; and the bystander who had helped me carry the boy now invited me to his apartment house in Sampaloc for coffee and conversation. It was about midnight. When we were near his place, we saw that Legarda was still in tumult. So we forgot all about the coffee and off to the battlefield we went again.

The demonstrators had captured an army truck near the market, near a PNB branch, and a noisy debate on what to do with it was going on. Some wanted to push the truck into the line of Metrocom and army men down the road, but its wheels had been punctured and this proved to be a difficult task. Others wanted to burn the truck down, and indeed someone threw a lighted match into the sheets of paper that had been dumped inside the truck. Another demonstrator, however, quickly jumped onto the truck and stomped out the fire; the houses were too close, he said, “h’wag na nating idamay ‘yong mga tao."

While the debate continued, two more army trucks beamed their headlights on the demonstrators and started moving forward, followed by the soldiers. The students started throwing stones. Some toughies in the area who had come out to join the demonstrators used slingshots, but kept swearing under their breath because they had no stock of homemade arrows. “Metrocom!went the shout. “Sumuko na kamo! Bato ini! The soldiers kept advancing, and then they started firing with Thompsons into the ground. We all scattered, except for one boy who did not even flinch and called to everybody to return. “Balik kayo, balik!he cried. “Hindi magpapaputok nang deretso ‘yan!I don’t know what happened to him, because when another round of firing started, I found myself in another dark alley, with a new group of companions.

When I got out again, the army truck was gone, and the soldiers were back at the corner of Recto and Legarda. A long lull followed, about 30 minutes. Then the soldiers started to advance again, someone hurled a molotov cocktail at them, they charged, cocking their guns and following us right into dark alleys where, as before, the demonstrators found doors being opened to them, or people at second-floor windows warning them with gestures about the presence of soldiers in alleys the demonstrators would enter. I somehow got separated from all my companions and found myself all alone under a kulahan, sitting on damp cement. The resident of an apartment house across the alley saw me and discreetly turned off his lights.

Quiet once more. I emerged from my hiding place and walked out into a street from which I could see the church on Earnshaw. There was a small group of students clustered at the door of an accessoria, talking animatedly, and I joined them. I was listening to them relate their experiences when, at the corner of Earnshaw and this street we were in, a squad of Metrocom men appeared. Everybody fled, except myself, two students, and the occupants of the accessoria, who worriedly told us to get in if we didn’t want to get hurt. In that dark, dingy, cramped accessoria, the two students and I stayed for a whole hour, seated on the steps of very narrow stairs, gulping down glasses and glasses of water, smoking, talking in whispers—“Rebolusyon na ito, brod,they said—until the coast was clear.

It was three o’clock in the morning when we came out. Later that morning, the papers said that four students, some of them non-demonstrators, had been killed: Feliciano Roldan of FEU, Ricardo Alcantara of UP, Fernando Catabay of MLQU, and Bernardo Tausa of Mapa High School. Almost 300 demonstrators and bystanders were arrested; most of them were detained at Camp Crame.

That night, the President appeared on television to inform the nation of the “premeditated attack on the government, an act of rebellion and subversion, which the military had successfully repulsed. “The mob that attempted to burn Malacañang, he said, “was not a mob of students, nor were they simply arsonists. They waved red banners, carried the flag with the red portion up, called the streets they occupied “liberated areas, and shouted “Dante for President! Therefore, said the President, “these men dedicated to an evil purpose, and that is to destroy Malacañang Palace and/or take it over. The plan to take over Malacañang, he went on, was hatched by either one or both of two groups—“one of them Communist-inspired and the other one not Communist-inspired. Both groups were under surveillance.

To his nation, the President had a message: “Rest assured that the situation is under control. Rest assured that we will maintain peace and order. Malacañang Palace is well guarded, but more than this, the country and our government is well guarded. There is no takeover by any group of the military or of the civilian government. In the matter of the preparation of the plans of reaction against any attempt to take over this government, the action that will be taken will be well-studied, deliberate, cautious, and legal, and there will be no attempt to curtail constitutional freedom.

To the “insurrectionary elements, he gave warning: “Any attempt at the forcible overthrow of the government will be put down immediately. I will not tolerate nor will I allow Communists to take over.

The same day, the nation learned that the retirement date of General Raval of the PC, which was supposed to be on February 1, had been postponed to April 1. The entire Armed Forces of the Philippines were on red alert.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Petitions against Proclamation 1959 will suffer defeat

For those who oppose martial law in Maguindanao, and with Senators saying that they stand to lose in an administration-dominated Lower House, the Supreme Court remains as the last venue for recourse.  Atty. Harry Roque, one of four petitioners who filed petitions questioning Proclamation 1959, prays that the Highest Court of the land stand steadfast against the martial law declaration.

I don't know if Harry knows but, the Supreme Court can only tackle one thing--whether or not there is factual and legal bases for the declaration. They cannot rule against the wisdom of the proclamation since that will be an intrusion into Executive power. The Highest Tribunal cannot also intrude into the legality of such proclamations since it is already an established Power under the 1987 Constitution.

The question really---did Mrs. Arroyo used her powers under the Constitution judiciously and within the boundaries given by law? Was there no abuse of such powers under the Constitution?

Now, I hate to say it but, I think even these petitions will suffer defeat, not because the Tribunal is being dominated by Arroyo appointees, no. The SC can only tackle if these facts, as stated in Mrs. Arroyo's report to Congress and construing the face of the Proclamation 1959 itself, are true. If these facts are true, then, the Supreme Court cannot question the wisdom behind the issuance of the proclamation. The SC also cannot contravene whether Mrs. Arroyo exercised her powers judiciously since that is not within the powers as contemplated by the Constitution. The hands of the Court are tied. Even if they all oppose the declaration, they cannot use that as a basis for declaring Proclamation 1959 as legally infirm and therefore, revocable.

Hence, expect defeat this early. Martial law will remain in Maguindanao, and possibly, even affect other provinces in Mindanao. This early, talks are rife that even Lanao del Norte and Lanao del Sur will be under martial law. It would not surprise me if Mrs. Arroyo place the entire Mindanao, except Surigao del Norte, Surigao del Sur and Zamboanga peninsula under military rule. That is not impossible.

What is very unsettling is the recent demand of the AFP for authorities to extend the period of martial law until May 2010. This will affect the results of the national elections in May 2010.

Seems like this government, with a collusion with the military, is forcing a non-proclamation scenario.

Slow Response of Congress Against Martial Rule is Portent of Things To Come


Sloooooow r-e-s-p-o-n-s-e.

It should have been today yet members of Congress decided that they will instead convene tomorrow to tackle Proclamation 1959. Constitutionalist Christian Monsod said Congress should have convened last Sunday or even "as late" as Monday (yesterday), but they did not.

Is this the kind of response we will expect later when Mrs. Arroyo decides to finally push the envelope further and declare the entire country under martial law? It has been days and surely rights have been violated if at all dis-respected in Maguindanao.


The slow response shown by both Houses reflect how poorly these Honorable Gentlemen and Ladies regard human rights. Every second and minute lost equates one or two people's rights to freedom violated.

It also shows political reality at best---that an administration-dominated House can actually wield more power than an oppositionist Senate.

These kinds of scenario are emboldening Mrs. Arroyo. This "experiment" in Martial law is only fuelling her base desires for another crack at it.

Now, if the Arroyo-dominated Supreme Court rules in favor of Martial law, that completes the entire picture. Surely, that will give the ultimate signal to those who want to extend the term of Mrs. Arroyo that the opposition is still weak and they can practically do whatever they want.

Woe to democracy in this country.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Opisyal na Pahayag ng Y.O.U. hinggil sa Martial Law sa Maguindanao

Nakababahala ang nagaganap sa ating bansa. Isinailalim sa batas militar ng isang Pangulong gumon sa kapangyarihan ang isang lalawigan sa kabila ng kawalan ng basehan dito. 

Ang pahayag ng batas militar ay direktang pambabastos sa Saligang Batas gayundin sa liderato ng Sandatahang Lakas ng Pilipinas.

Pambabastos sapagkat hindi isinaalang-alang ni Ginang Arroyo kung mayroon ngang sapat na basehan upang gamitin ang kapangyarihang ito.

Pambabastos din sa liderato ng Sandatahang Lakas ng Pilipinas sapagkat bago pa man isinailalim sa batas militar ang Maguindanao, halos sapat na ang puwersang ipinadala ng hepe ng AFP na si General Victor Ibrado upang kontrolin ang sitwasyon.

Sa hanay ng Young Organizers' Union, kabilang na ang Young Officers' Union (Y.O.U.), ipinapahayag namin ang aming mariing pagtutol sa pagsasailalim sa Maguindanao sa batas militar. Ang aksyong ito ni Ginang Arroyo ay palatandaan lamang na nais niyang manatili sa puwesto.

Panahon na upang maipagpatuloy ang aming nasimulang pakikibaka noong 1986. Panahon na upang maipagsanggalang ang Sambayanang Pilipino laban sa mapanira at mapamuksang pamamahala ni Arroyo.

Tumitindig muli kami laban sa batas militar. Tumitindig muli kami upang maipagpatuloy ang pakikibaka ng Sambayanan.

Tumitindig kami dahil ayaw naming muling masadlak sa madilim na kinabukasan ang Inang Bayan.

Patricio Mangubat
Pangkalahatang Kalihim
Young Organizers' Union (YOU)

Carlos Maglalang
Founder at Spokesperson
Young Officers' Union (YOU)

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Martial Law in Maguindanao: What shall we do?


Proclamation 1959 was the third time Martial law was availed of by government as an emergency measure.

The first time was when President Jose P. Laurel, the government caretaker, declared martial rule when foreign invaders entered Manila. The Laurel proclamation was deemed judicious because the country was then under invasion.


The second was the classic Proclamation 1081 on September 21, 1972 by former president Ferdinand Edralin Marcos. The country was not under invasion; rather there was an ensuing rebellion. Under the 1945 Constitution, there were only two instances when Martial law can be declared: invasion, rebellion or insurrection. “ Lawless violence“, this term in the Philippine Constitution describes the condition caused by either invasion or rebellion, but not as an independent condition by itself. There may be lawless violence but the answer is not Martial law but the application of the full force of the law.


In Proclamation 1081, Marcos was actually right in the application of Martial law. There was an existing rebellion. Jose Maria Sison already founded the Communist Party of the Philippines and has since created rebel camps and assassination squads as early as 1970. Student protests were all over. With this rebellion, lawless violence ensued and even affected the capital. Hence, the President had the right to call out the Armed Forces to quell the rebellion.



Remember that these two instances–the Laurel and Marcos proclamations—there were two existing conditions–the country was invaded by a foreign power (Laurel) while there was domestic instability caused by a Communist rebellion (Marcos).


Now, let’s see if this Proclamation 1959 of Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo satisfies the requisites as provided by the 1987 Constitution for the declaration of Martial law.



In the 1987 Constitution, there are actually three conditions stated: invasion, rebellion or coup d’etat. Clearly, the Constitution meant for these conditions to be existing prior to a declaration. Martial rule, as a concept, was never meant to be used as either a deterrent nor as a pre-emptive measure. The framers of the Constitution specifically used the word “suppress” to express the real intention of Section 18, Article 7 of the Constitution.


Now, what causes confusion in the interpretation of this provision in the 1987 Constitution?


It is the inclusion of the word “prevent” in the first sentence that gives every President the legal basis for calling out the Armed Forces even if the threat is just “imminent”. Look at how Section 18 was framed:


Section 18. The President shall be the Commander-in-Chief of all armed forces of the Philippines and whenever it becomes necessary, he may call out such armed forces to PREVENT or SUPPRESS lawless violence, invasion or rebellion (include coup d’etat)
It is clear that the President has the power to call out the armed forces to address these four conditions. But, is this the paragraph that justifies martial law? No. The second sentence of the same provision is clearly what the Framers actually intended as a condition for the proclamation of martial law.


“…In case of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it, he may, for a period not exceeding sixty days, suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus OR place the Philippines or any part thereof under martial law.”



Clearly, there are only TWO conditions, which must exist, BEFORE the President can actually declare martial law—invasion or rebellion.

In the case of Maguindanao, Proclamation 1959 was issued at a time when the military has already neutralized members of the Ampatuan family, believed to be the masterminds behind the brutal massacre. Troops were already in the area and has surrounded the compound of the warlord. Arms were already seized.

In fact, previous press statements of Malacanang issued shortly after the massacre indicates that the situation has been placed under control. When Mrs. Arroyo placed three provinces believed to be under the control of the Ampatuans under the State of Emergency proclamation, the situation in the area normalized and there was no indication that a rebellion was existing nor was there a threat even, of rebellion.


Given that there was no factual basis for the declaration of martial law, what should Congress do at this point?


I do not agree with Speaker Prospero Nograles Jr. assertion that the sentence in Section 18 was just discretionary, not directory. Look at how this sentence was framed:


“…Within forty-eight hours from the proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, the President shall submit a report in person or in writing to the Congress. The Congress, voting jointly, by a vote of at least a majority of all its Members, in regular or special session, may revoke such proclamation or suspension, which revocation shall not be set aside by the President.”


Two things: President is MANDATED by the Constitution to report to Congress and second, Congress has to CONVENE itself either in regular or SPECIAL SESSION. IN FACT, the Constitution DIRECTS CONGRESS TO IMMEDIATELY CONVENE WITHIN TWENTY FOUR HOURS FOLLOWING THE PROCLAMATION OR SUSPENSION..WITHOUT NEED OF A CALL.


These provisions are DIRECTORY or MANDATORY, not subject to the whims or caprices of the Speaker or of that of the Senate President.


The question really is—when is the proper time for Congress to convene?


If Congress is in session, they must convene within forty eight hours. In the case of Maguindanao, they have to do it as early as Tuesday morning, since the proclamation took effect 7 o’clock in the morning of December 4, which fell on a Saturday. If they are NOT in session, they should have called it by TODAY, Sunday, December 5.


* Note: In computing for a period, the first day is excluded and the last day included. In Article 13 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, it is said, and to wit:


Art. 13. When the law speaks of years, months, days or nights, it shall be understood that years are of three hundred sixty five days each; months, of thirty days; days, of twenty-foiur houses; and nights, from sunset to sunrise.


If months are designated by their name, they shall be computed by the number of days which they respectively have.


In computing a period, the first day shall be excluded and the last day included.


Now, was there legal basis for what Senator Juan Ponce-Enrile said that when it meant 48 hours, that means that it should be working hours, meaning, government offices must be OPEN before he, as Senate President, can CALL and CONVENE the Senate? By all means, NO.


Section 18 of Article 7 of the 1987 Constitution is a directory provision and we are talking here of a suspension of rights and privileges extended to citizens living in a democracy. Are we to wait for government offices to open BEFORE ENRILE calls for his fellow Senators to convene? The Constitution is clear—if not in session, convene even without a call. If they are in session, convene within forty eight hours. Forty eight hours mean that it starts at 7 o-clock in the morning and ends at 7AM in the morning of Tuesday.